Injuries is usually a challenge for professional athletes in sport and every athlete and team will almost always be considering techniques to protect against injuries. There are actually generally two kinds of injury which could happen in sport. One is the trauma that is more difficult to prevent and relies on methods such as rule modifications to protect athletes and the use of protective equipment. Another type of injury is the one related to the training workloads and it is usually an overuse kind of injury. To avoid these kinds of injuries, then there has to be a careful management of the amount of work or training which the athlete performs. It is important that training loads are increased little by little so the athlete's tissues has time to adjust to the stresses that are. If there's a large amount of load, then an injury is a lot more prone to come about.
There have been designed a array of monitoring methods in which are used to maintain a check up on the athlete's workload to ensure they have sufficient rests and down time to ensure that the tissues will adapt to those loads. A particular problem is once the athlete has a surge or sudden rise in the exercise load in comparison to the historical past exercise load. A formula, known as acute:chronic workload ratio has been designed with the acute workload being exactly what the athlete has done in the previous week and the chronic workload being what they've done in the last thirty days. Should there be an increase in this ratio, then they are considered to be at risk for injury. Even though this will appear reasonably straightforward, there is definitely extensive debate around the research which support this model. A newly released edition of PodChatLive explained these issues with Franco Impellizzeri on these trouble with the model and how it may be worked ahead into the future.